Land of the Ranger.
aber-flyingtiger:

thegreatgadfly:

poppypicklesticks:

thespectacularspider-girl:

blish-block:

stay-in-reality-liberals:

durkin62:

theultraintrovert:

durkin62:

fandomsandfeminism:

whatwhiteswillneverknow:

… with different degrees of struggles that we’re implemented by the pale skin via conquests using weapons such as warfare, religion indoctrination, and oppression. And then after pale skin set systems like this into our society, they go around and say things like “We are all human” and confuse “racism” with “prejudice” so that they can keep the system the same way for many years to come.

Shots fired.

More like you morons completely forget your ancestors did the same damn shit and then try to change the definition of words to exempt yourself from criticism. 

Yes because PoC have set up a system where People of Color have ~poc privilege~, don’t confuse “racism” and “prejudice”.

Actually yes they have. 
Racism against whites article. 
Study on anti-white attitudes. 
White kid driven to suicide by Asian gang.
Murdered for supporting Obama while being white.
Raped and stoned to death for being white.
Raped and murdered for being white.
Teenager killed for being white.
Mobs of black criminals attack white neighborhoods nationwide. 
4 month crime wave justifies by venting against whites.
Anglophobia.
Genocide of whites.
Another white genocide.
Rape Jihads
The knoxville horror.
No go zones for non Muslims.
Pearcy Massacre.
Whichita Massacre.
White girl turned into Kabobs.
Being too white.
The zebra killings.
List of black on white crimes.
Racial fueled crime statistics.
Misclassifying murderers as white.
Mayans and Aztecs weren’t carving people’s hearts outs of their chests for the gods.
The Mongols killing at least 30,000,000 people?
Along with Mao and his death toll
Armenian genocide at the hands of the Turkish?
Japanese Empire raping, killing, and looting all over the Pacific? 
Native Americans being tribes of warrior societies who constantly fought each other? 
Iroquois tribes being imperialistic land grabbing machines of brutality? 
Yuan-Ming dynasty transition? 
Qing conquering of the Ming dynasty?
Taiping Rebellion? 
An Lushan Rebellion? .
Congo wars? 
Somalian Civil War? 
Nigerian Civil War?
Rwanda? 
Nairobi Mall attack? 
Cambodian Genocide? 
Benghali Genocide? 
Arab Empire:Turkish Empire:Mongol Empire:Hunnic Empire:Japanese Empire:Persian Empire:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Africa
Don’t forget that other countries besides America exist, and damn sure don’t change the definition of fucking words, you dumb cunt. 

Well look at that.

The weirdest thing about all of this stuff is they seem to think prejudice is fine. Diet racism. Racism lite. Skim racism.

This is how racist Tumblr is.
Not only do they have such an Americanized view of history and the world but they apply it to everything, where the world thing ever in the world was the white people claiming First Nation’s land and enslaving Africans (and yes, those are awful things, but other nations have done similar).
Not only that, they act like if you aren’t white, you were fucking helpless little lambs for all of history, incapable of evil, brutality or violence.  They’re treating entire ethnic groups like children, free of responsibility because of their skin color.  Only white people are apparently ‘worthy’ enough respect to be judged by their actions.

Today I leaned “PoC” don’t even have “privilege” or whatever you want to call it in nations they founded themselves where they are the overwhelming majority.  
White privilege applies in Japan?  Try leaving the house once in a while you uneducated shit-for-brains shut-ins. 

Once again, there is no reason to think of racism or sexism as “power + prejudice.” That usage is unique to the field of sociology, in which the “power plus prejudice” crap is a technical term. It’s not a common definition, and moreover it’s not a technical term in all academic disciplines. Psychology is perfectly at home equating racism and sexism with pure prejudice. Also, sociology is among the most intellectually dishonest fields in contemporary academia (see: here & here).
There is, simply put, no good reason for anyone to use “racism” to mean a system, rather than using the adjectival form of “racism” to apply to the system, as in “racist system.” If sociologists find it convenient to use “racism” to describe a system, that is because sociology - apart from being the softest of the soft sciences - deals in behavior of large groups, which means the “discrimination” part of the definition of racism is what matters to them. Consequently, they emphasize the behavioral manifestations rather than the more subjective or cognitive or individual facets.
But unless you’re prepared to argue some kind of radical behaviorist or utilitarian or otherwise anti-mentalist philosophy, there is no reason to adapt the technical term for common use. The only reason strong enough to make a movement attempt to do that would be if it were congenial to their purposes. That is, if redefining the word served their ends. And, of course, it does. You don’t have to be a cynic to see how defining racism so that, no matter what, non-white people cannot be in any way responsible for it serves the end of this particular special interest. Serves them, I might add, at the expense of nuance or correspondence to reality.
In sum, people who want to tell you that “racism = power + prejudice” are really just trying to frame the terms of the debate, move the goalposts a little, and specially plead for their control of the discourse.
It’s kind of sad, actually.

I’m gobsmacked that somebody suggested that religious indoctrination and warfare are unique to white people. 


Fucking lawyered.

aber-flyingtiger:

thegreatgadfly:

poppypicklesticks:

thespectacularspider-girl:

blish-block:

stay-in-reality-liberals:

durkin62:

theultraintrovert:

durkin62:

fandomsandfeminism:

whatwhiteswillneverknow:

… with different degrees of struggles that we’re implemented by the pale skin via conquests using weapons such as warfare, religion indoctrination, and oppression. And then after pale skin set systems like this into our society, they go around and say things like “We are all human” and confuse “racism” with “prejudice” so that they can keep the system the same way for many years to come.

Shots fired.

More like you morons completely forget your ancestors did the same damn shit and then try to change the definition of words to exempt yourself from criticism. 

Yes because PoC have set up a system where People of Color have ~poc privilege~, don’t confuse “racism” and “prejudice”.

Actually yes they have. 

Racism against whites article. 

Study on anti-white attitudes. 

White kid driven to suicide by Asian gang.

Murdered for supporting Obama while being white.

Raped and stoned to death for being white.

Raped and murdered for being white.

Teenager killed for being white.

Mobs of black criminals attack white neighborhoods nationwide. 

4 month crime wave justifies by venting against whites.

Anglophobia.

Genocide of whites.

Another white genocide.

Rape Jihads

The knoxville horror.

No go zones for non Muslims.

Pearcy Massacre.

Whichita Massacre.

White girl turned into Kabobs.

Being too white.

The zebra killings.

List of black on white crimes.

Racial fueled crime statistics.

Misclassifying murderers as white.

Mayans and Aztecs weren’t carving people’s hearts outs of their chests for the gods.

The Mongols killing at least 30,000,000 people?

Along with Mao and his death toll

Armenian genocide at the hands of the Turkish?

Japanese Empire raping, killing, and looting all over the Pacific? 

Native Americans being tribes of warrior societies who constantly fought each other? 

Iroquois tribes being imperialistic land grabbing machines of brutality? 

Yuan-Ming dynasty transition? 

Qing conquering of the Ming dynasty?

Taiping Rebellion? 

An Lushan Rebellion? .

Congo wars? 

Somalian Civil War? 

Nigerian Civil War?

Rwanda? 

Nairobi Mall attack? 

Cambodian Genocide? 

Benghali Genocide? 

Arab Empire:
Map of expansion of Caliphate.svg

Turkish Empire:


Mongol Empire:


Hunnic Empire:


Japanese Empire:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b3/Japanese_Empire_%28orthographic_projection%29.svg/200px-Japanese_Empire_%28orthographic_projection%29.svg.png

Persian Empire:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/67/The_Achaemenid_Empire_under_Darius_the_Great%21.jpg/320px-The_Achaemenid_Empire_under_Darius_the_Great%21.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Africa

Don’t forget that other countries besides America exist, and damn sure don’t change the definition of fucking words, you dumb cunt. 

Well look at that.

The weirdest thing about all of this stuff is they seem to think prejudice is fine. Diet racism. Racism lite. Skim racism.

This is how racist Tumblr is.

Not only do they have such an Americanized view of history and the world but they apply it to everything, where the world thing ever in the world was the white people claiming First Nation’s land and enslaving Africans (and yes, those are awful things, but other nations have done similar).

Not only that, they act like if you aren’t white, you were fucking helpless little lambs for all of history, incapable of evil, brutality or violence.  They’re treating entire ethnic groups like children, free of responsibility because of their skin color.  Only white people are apparently ‘worthy’ enough respect to be judged by their actions.

Today I leaned “PoC” don’t even have “privilege” or whatever you want to call it in nations they founded themselves where they are the overwhelming majority.  

White privilege applies in Japan?  Try leaving the house once in a while you uneducated shit-for-brains shut-ins. 

Once again, there is no reason to think of racism or sexism as “power + prejudice.” That usage is unique to the field of sociology, in which the “power plus prejudice” crap is a technical term. It’s not a common definition, and moreover it’s not a technical term in all academic disciplines. Psychology is perfectly at home equating racism and sexism with pure prejudice. Also, sociology is among the most intellectually dishonest fields in contemporary academia (see: here & here).

There is, simply put, no good reason for anyone to use “racism” to mean a system, rather than using the adjectival form of “racism” to apply to the system, as in “racist system.” If sociologists find it convenient to use “racism” to describe a system, that is because sociology - apart from being the softest of the soft sciences - deals in behavior of large groups, which means the “discrimination” part of the definition of racism is what matters to them. Consequently, they emphasize the behavioral manifestations rather than the more subjective or cognitive or individual facets.

But unless you’re prepared to argue some kind of radical behaviorist or utilitarian or otherwise anti-mentalist philosophy, there is no reason to adapt the technical term for common use. The only reason strong enough to make a movement attempt to do that would be if it were congenial to their purposes. That is, if redefining the word served their ends. And, of course, it does. You don’t have to be a cynic to see how defining racism so that, no matter what, non-white people cannot be in any way responsible for it serves the end of this particular special interest. Serves them, I might add, at the expense of nuance or correspondence to reality.

In sum, people who want to tell you that “racism = power + prejudice” are really just trying to frame the terms of the debate, move the goalposts a little, and specially plead for their control of the discourse.

It’s kind of sad, actually.

I’m gobsmacked that somebody suggested that religious indoctrination and warfare are unique to white people. 

Fucking lawyered.

check-your-privilege-feminists:

durkin62:

acceber74:

bitterseafigtree:

audio-sexual:

epherites:

afroboheme:

skinnyniggaballin:

flawlessxqueen:

designbydiaspora:

lovelylavenderchild:

darvinasafo:

Y’all believe it now?

You’re fucking kidding me right?

People are suffering to Ebola and America had a way to potentially cure it

AND THEY REFUSE A FUCKING REQUEST?

Does saving lives not mean anything to anyone anymore?

I fucking cant

Who’s really surprised? AMERICA isn’t shit & never will be.

They said it costing too much was part of the issue but I haven’t seen the government have any issue with the billions of dollars they constantly give Israel to do any mother fucking thing they please.

Seriously?! the US ain’t shit

Didn’t they give it to a Spanish patient today

Wtf America

http://www.usnews.com/news/business/articles/2014/08/11/spanish-ebola-patient-gets-experimental-drug

It’s fucking true. They said no to Nigeria. But then ship it right the fuck out to Spain for one patient.

It is so hard to love a country that does not value you/people who look like you.

Welp/

Told y’all this was going to happen. Just like what they did with the HIV/AIDS drug treatments. 

So did none of you actually read the sources here or what? 

Liberia announced Monday that it would soon receive doses of an experimental Ebola drug and give it to two sick doctors, making them the first Africans to receive some of the scarce treatment in a spiraling outbreak.”

Why aren’t they giving out more? 

In a statement, the California-based company said that in responding to a request from an unidentified West African country, it had run out of its supply of the treatment.” “That treatment is so new that it hasn’t been tested for safety or effectiveness in humans. And the company has said it would take months to produce even modest quantities.”

Why wasn’t it shipped to Liberia immediately? "Since the drug was shipped for use outside the U.S., appropriate export procedures had to be followed."

You can’t just ship an untested drug to a foreign country without a metric shit ton of red tape to cross. If we allowed this we would have all kinds of fucking “companies” shipping random shit to wherever on the basis that is “medicine”. Since we wouldn’t need to properly test it, or go through the proper procedures to track it. 

There was an incredibly limited supply of this. Not nearly enough to make an impact on the outbreak. But enough to test the drugs effects, kind of. What are they gonna do, go to a hospital and hand them 3 samples and tell them to pick who to live and let the rest fend for themselves?

And we have far better medical facilities here in America. Which makes it a whole lot fucking easier to monitor what’s happening to the people being experimented on. Which were still not sure of the effects, the survival rate of ebola is about 40% anyway, more so if the person in question is a healthy adult. So statistically speaking about half of the patients should be recovering even without the drug. So having all 3 showing signs of improvement is far from a certainty that the drug works. And we have no clue of the long term implications. 

What would have happened if the drug failed? People would be losing their fucking minds over a company in America using sick Africans as test subjects for their drug that killed them. The backlash would have drove the company out of business. Speaking of which, why the fuck would a company make such a drug and willingly withhold it from the people who need it? That’s a pretty fucking retarded business venture. 

THESE DRUGS ARE STILL EXPERIMENTAL WHY DOES NO ONE ON THIS SITE UNDERSTAND THAT. THIS IS NOT A CURE. WE DON’T EVEN KNOW IF IT WORKS. DO YOU WANT TO USE AFRICAN PEOPLE AS JUST TEST SUBJECTS?? WHAT IF THIS DRUG TURNS OUT VERY BAD OR TO NOT WORK AT ALL? YOU’D STILL BLAME THE AMERICANS.

Just adding to this, a number of the people who have been treated are medical personnel, meaning they actually understand what is going on and can give reasonably informed consent while understanding the risks. As stated above, these are untested drugs and you can be damn sure there would be a backlash if it ended up doing more harm than good.

thenameisnotpickles:

stop seperating relationship expectations.

why is it expected that he needs space and not her?

why is it assumed that “she” will be the one asking too much?

why doesn’t it tell him not to cheat?

who says she wants to be treated like a princess?

who says “he” would be the one to ignore her?

who says she needs protecting? or wants it?

why cant he need protecting?

STOP PUTTING GENDER ON EVERYTHING THING.

IT DOESN’T EXIST

we should stop attributing false binary differences into everyday things.

Thank you^

molecularbiologistproblems:

Via Velica on DeviantART

molecularbiologistproblems:

Via Velica on DeviantART


Say that again, and know that if you’re lying to me, I will find you and I will ssssskin you.


If what you’re saying is true, I’ll make you rich. If it’s not, I’ll make you shoes.

Say that again, and know that if you’re lying to me, I will find you and I will ssssskin you.

If what you’re saying is true, I’ll make you rich. If it’s not, I’ll make you shoes.

much-privileged-so-oppress:

missvoltairine:

mamakarkat:

WHY ARE PEOPLE WITH PENISES GIVEN FREE CONDOMS WHEN THEY DON’T NEED TO HAVE SEX BUT PEOPLE WITH VAGINAS STILL HAVE TO PAY FOR THINGS LIKE PADS AND TAMPONS FOR SOMETHING THEY CAN’T STOP

because of the AIDS crisis. We’ve…

riseagainsthearts:

Rise Against posters

ivorywild:

I REALLY FECKIN LOVE RISE AGAINST. LIKE I DON’T HAVE TO EXPLAIN WHY BECAUSE EVERYONE SHOULD LOVE RISE AGAINST

ivorywild:

I REALLY FECKIN LOVE RISE AGAINST. LIKE I DON’T HAVE TO EXPLAIN WHY BECAUSE EVERYONE SHOULD LOVE RISE AGAINST

White feminists:

split-the-coast:

When you discuss the wage gap, here are a few things to keep in mind:

  • Only white women make $0.77 to a man’s dollar.
  • Black women make about $0.68 to a man’s dollar.
  • Latina women make about $0.58 to a man’s dollar.

Intersectionality matters.

Sources? No? Thought not.